A survey on the amount of adherence to STARD and CONSORT standards in the abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies and randomized controlled trials published in International Continence Society abstract book 2011

  • Kasra Kolahdouzan Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Neda Madani Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Neda Parniyanfard Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Hadi Mostafaie Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Kimia Madanlou Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Arian Pourmalek Students research committee, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
  • Morteza Ghojazadeh Medical Education research center, TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Sakineh Hajebrahimi Urology department, Iranian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz
Keywords: International continence society, CONSORT, STARD

Abstract

Purpose : To assess reporting quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (DASs) published in International Continence Society (ICS) abstract book 2011.

Methods: Reports of RCTs and DASs published in ICS abstract book 2011 were identified. The proportion of adherence to each item in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) checklists was evaluated for each article abstract by two independent reviewers masked to each other’s results giving one point to each item of the used checklists only if it was clearly defined in the abstract.

Results: Out of 287 articles, 67 articles matched our inclusion criteria (37 RCTs and 30 DASs). The mean scores were 10.70 and 15.03 out of 17 and 25 respectively. The highest scored items were items 5 and 15 (INTERVENTION and CONCLUSION) in the CONSORT group (both being reported in 97.3% of articles). In the STARD group, items 2, 3, and 25 (INTRODUCTION, PARTICIPANTS/POPULATION and DISCUSSION) were fully reported. The lowest scored items were item 2 (AUTHORS) in the consort group and item 11 (TEST METHODS/BLINDING) in the diagnostic accuracy group reported in 0% and 13.3% of articles respectively.

Conclusions: Our study revealed that the adherence level is moderate in both groups. In a high ranking society like ICS, we do believe that adopting these two tools would improve the reporting quality. 

References

Bruns DE. The STARD initiative and the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem 2003 Jan;49(1):19-20.

Borg Debono V, Zhang S, Ye C, Paul J, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Murthy Y, Thabane L. The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement. BMC Anesthesiol 2012 Jul 4;12:13.

Al-Namankany AA, Ashley P, Moles DR, Parekh S. Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in paediatric dentistry journals. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009 Sep;19(5):318-24. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

Sargeant JM, O'Connor AM, Gardner IA, Dickson JS, Torrence ME, Dohoo IR, Lefebvre SL, Morley PS, Ramirez A, Snedeker K. The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration. J Food Prot 2010 Mar;73(3):579-603.

Rios LP, Odueyungbo A, Moitri MO, Rahman MO, Thabane L. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008 Oct;93(10):3810-6. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

Zhang D, Yin P, Freemantle N, Jordan R, Zhong N, Cheng KK. An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China. Trials 2008 Apr 24;9:22.

Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, Alanoglu Z. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92.

Cobos-Carbó A; CONSORT group. [Randomized clinical trials (CONSORT)]. Med Clin (Barc) 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:21-7.

Sargeant JM, Elgie R, Valcour J, Saint-Onge J, Thompson A, Marcynuk P, Snedeker K. Methodological quality and completeness of reporting in clinical trials conducted in livestock species. Prev Vet Med 2009 Oct 1;91(2-4):107-15. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF; CONSORT Group. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2008 Jan 22;5(1):e20.

Altman DG, Moher D. Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures. Med Clin (Barc) 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:8-13.

Zintzaras E, Papathanasiou A, Ziogas D, Voulgarelis M. The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012 Jun 25;13(1):113. [Epub ahead of print].

Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637–639

Published
2013-04-07
Section
Research Articles