An integrated assessment proforma and education package improves thromboembolic prophylaxis prescription in urological patients

  • Natalia White Salisbury District Hospital Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust Salisbury SP2 9BJ
  • Shamil Mubarak Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, HP11 2TT
  • John M Henderson Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, HP11 2TT, UK
  • Jonathan Pattinson Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, HP11 2TT, UK
  • Jonathan Greenland Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, HP11 2TT, UK
Keywords: urology, audit, thrombosis, thromboprophylaxis, vte, dvt

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) has published evidence-based guidance on assessing and reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite this, practice and compliance are variable. We report a complete audit cycle, which quantified compliance and then implemented measures to improve compliance toNICE guidelines in Wycombe Hospital (district general hospital, Oxfordshire) Urology Department.

METHODS: The case-notes of 48 consecutively discharged inpatients were reviewed and 22 data items extracted. These included evidence of a VTE risk assessment having been completed, prescription of compression stockings and prescription of low molecular weight heparin. From these, the level of compliance with NICE guidelines was determined.

RESULTS: Our initial audit revealed that only 10% of 48 patients had been both risk assessed and prescribed appropriate prophylaxis during their admission. Potential reasons for non-compliance were identified and targeted changes implemented. The three interventions were 1) a urology emergency admission clerking proforma with integrated thromboembolic risk assessment (UAP), 2) formal VTE education for doctors at monthly clinical governance meetings and 3) incorporation of thromboembolic prophylaxis training into junior doctor induction. Six months later, the casenotes of 49 patients were reviewed using identical methodology. The rate of full compliance had risen from 10% to 65%.

CONCLUSION:  An integrated UAP form and education package improves VTE risk assessment and thromboembolic prophylaxis prescription in urological patients. The UAP may also be a useful tool for implementing future improvements to urological practice.

Author Biography

Natalia White, Salisbury District Hospital Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust Salisbury SP2 9BJ
-

References

Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, ineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133(6 Suppl):381S-453S.

Lindblad B, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verified by necropsy over 30 years. BMJ 1991;302:709–711.

Alikhan R, Peters F, Wilmott R, Cohen AT. Fatal pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: a necropsy review. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:1254–1257.

The National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 92: Venous thromboembolism: reducing the risk. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to hospital. 2010.

Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust. Guideline 733.1: Mandatory Risk Assessment for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) for Surgery unless when an ICP is in use. 2010;Appendix 6.4:WZZ 1244.

Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, Samama CM. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopaedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th edition: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e227S-77S.

Published
2013-03-30
Section
Clinical Audit